Primary players in the planning and coordination included the Combined Arms Center, the Army G3/5/7, the Training and Doctrine Command Analysis Center, and the United Kingdom Land Warfare Center. The Battle Command Battle Laboratory-Leavenworth, in coordination with the UK-LWC and TRAC, collaboratively planned, prepared and executed TS/OF10 experiment distributively from Fort Leavenworth; Warminster, U.K.; Fort Benning, Ga.; Fort Gordon, Ga.; Fort Monroe, Va.; Redstone Arsenal, Ala.; and Fort Bliss, Texas.

The experiment, by design, enabled an assessment of operating capabilities between U.S. and U.K. units in the current timeframe and then transitioned to a future environment  with the introduction of emerging technologies and their effect on operations. More than 600 U.S. and U.K. soldiers, civilians and contractors were required to support this experiment from multiple locations. At Fort Leavenworth, more than 250 personnel were required to replicate the coalition joint forces land component command and division command posts and provide analyst support.

During the first two weeks of the event, training and orientation was provided both locally and distributively. This training allowed the new personnel to participate in team building activities that oriented them to their roles and functions, scenario, road to war and command and control system training that included the Command Post of the Future and other U.K. and U.S. battle command systems in use today. Mini exercises and tactical vignettes finalized the training to allow the command post personnel to exercise and practice the staff procedures they would be performing.

The third week was the Talon Strike portion of the event that involved using current force equipment and technology as the experimentation baseline. Talon Strike was co-sponsored by the Department of the Army and the U.K. Chief of Staff (Land Forces) and endorsed by the U.K.-U.S. Army Staff Talks. It also served as a train-up for the 12th U.K. Brigade’s anticipated deployment to Afghanistan.

The fourth and final week of the event was the Omni Fusion 2010 portion using 2017 future force battle command concepts and equipment. This allowed Army concept developers to explore emerging concepts related to the human dimensions of mission command within the context of division, joint and multinational operations. It also allowed exploration of how interagency and intergovernmental elements are integrated into the operation.

To have a successful experiment, BCBL worked closely with the United Kingdom Land Warfare Centre. A close working relationship was developed between the Combined Arms Center’s BCBL and a significant number of organizations, people, cultures and armies.

Col. Mark Forman, deputy director for the BCBL, praised for the entire endeavor.

“During the planning and preparation activities over the past year, the BCBL overcame a ‘surge’s’ impact on our operational force, an earthquake in Haiti that drew a back-up division … and interagency participation, a volcano that redirected/delayed/blocked some participation, as well as multiple bureaucratic hurdles and the inevitable digital ‘friction,’” Forman said. “Yet, a great team of professionals from organizations throughout TRADOC and across the globe pulled this off in an extremely professional and successful manner. This enabled an increased understanding of each other’s forces capabilities and procedures.”

Col. Crispian Beattie, the U.K. co-experiment director, provided positive feedback on the complex technical aspects of the event.

“A few technical issues related to the U.K.’s transition during OF10, to the Common Battlefield Application Toolset versus the existing systems and multiple entries coming from the U.S. multinational inter-operability programs gateway; however, these issues have been resolved, or significantly improved, with minimal impact on the event,” Beattie said.

During the event, both the LWC and BCBL-L hosted showcase days and invited leaders from throughout each respective Army to visit the facilities and observe the experiment.  BCBL hosted representatives from the Combined Arms Center’s Future Force Integration Directorate, U.K. Land Warfare Development Group, TRADOC Army Capabilities Integration Center’s Joint and Army Experimentation Division, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, U.S. Air Force’s Research Laboratory, Joint Forces Command, and the British Defence Staff. Videoteleconferences between the U.S. and U.K. co-experiment directors and both groups of VIPs to exchange of questions and ideas. Questions and discussions focused on the need for continued events like TS/OF10, feedback on emerging digital application efforts, host nation security forces’ future use of command and control systems and handheld devices, and lessons learned associated with TS/OF10.

The event ended May 21 with a collaborative brief via videoteleconference to the CAC commander and all participants, and recognition of those who contributed significantly to the great success of the event.

“TS/OF10 was a highly successful, multinational combined exercise and experiment, said Tom Jordan, CAC CDID director. “A genuine and effective partnership was developed between the Combined Arms Center, TRADOC Analysis Center, and U.K. Land Warfare Centre. This partnership contributed to the overall success of the event.  TS/OF10 provided a high return on the substantial resources invested by the U.S. and U.K. armies.”

By Jack Burkett

Note: Jack Burkett if the deputy chief of the Battle Command Battle Laboratory’s Experimentation Branch.

This virtual reality shooting range at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base is not just for combat personnel anymore. The government is making it available to military truck drivers, finance officers and others who are increasingly being exposed to hostile fire in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“When they used to be qualified with a weapon, they were pretty sure they were never going to have to use it,” said base commander Col. Bradley Spacy. “They can’t be sure anymore.”

Loren Thompson, a defense analyst with the Lexington Institute in Arlington, Va., said the Air Force has taken on roles such as base security and truck driving in Iraq and Afghanistan that it didn’t typically do in the past.

Numerous Air Force bases use firearms simulators, according to Air Force spokesman Vincent King at the Pentagon. Law enforcement agencies and other branches of the military also use virtual reality for shooting practice.

The walls of the hangar at Wright-Patterson are hung with camouflage netting. Real guns stripped of their bullets — from M-9 pistols to M-16 rifles — are lined up on the floor facing two home theater-sized video screens.

“You’re hot,” Master Sgt. David Small tells two shooters, warning them he is starting the computer program.

The screens light up. A desert scene is projected. Incoming mortars hit with a thud, sending showers of sand into the air. Shadowy figures and flashes of gunfire are seen in the distance.

The two U.S. shooters fire back. A computer marks and measures the accuracy of the shots.

Between 35 and 45 people are practicing with the system each week, most of them non-security personnel.

“It drives your adrenaline — those things that actually kick in in the real-world environment versus just sitting in a range,” said Small, who has used the system.

Maj. Christopher Duffley, an intelligence officer who has been deployed overseas five times, has practiced on the system between 10 and 20 times.

“Typically for a field like intelligence or other ones, we don’t get to touch firearms very often,” Duffley said. “You become a lot more confident in your own abilities.”
Staff Sgt. Zachary Odonish, a communications specialist, has used the system three times.

“It’s definitely a lot more realistic than just going to the firing range,” he said.

Thompson said virtual reality systems have become an effective training tool for the military.

“If you can capture the visual feeling of the combat experience, it is very, very similar to actually being in that experience,” Thompson said.

The system, which the base bought in January for $400,000, trains airmen how to hit moving targets in combat conditions and how to communicate with each other, reload quickly and fix a jammed weapon.

The simulator at Wright-Patterson is made by Meggitt Training Systems Inc., based in Suwanee, Ga., which has sold about 5,200 virtual systems around the world including about 900 to the U.S. Marines and Army National Guard.

Capt. Heather Bautista (standing) checks the operation of a virtual reality software for returning veterans with combat post traumatic stress disorder at the David Grant USAF Medical Center at Travis Air Force Base, Calif., April 17. Captain Bautista is a social worker at the center's mental health clinic. (U.S. Air Force photo/Lance Cheung)

Mental health therapists and social workers at the David Grant USAF Medical Center at Travis Air Force Base, Calif., are currently using a virtual reality program to treat servicemembers who suffer from post traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD, after returning from combat operations.

“PTSD is an anxiety disorder that occurs sometimes after a person has experienced a traumatic event,” said Capt. Heather Bautista, a social worker in the Mental Health Clinic.

“Not everybody who experiences trauma is going to develop PTSD but if this traumatic event is something that you witnessed either yourself or vicariously and you thought that your life was in danger or others were in danger you can develop this. We are helping the patient deal with avoidance. Avoidance is the key to PTSD.”

To help deal with the patient’s avoidance to their situation medical professionals use the virtual reality software, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy Application for Post Traumatic Stress. The program includes a motion-inducing platform, headphones, a cued-smells generator, a mock M-16 with directional controls/game controller and a virtual reality visor to help veterans relive their situation. The software has been introduced to eight bases in the Air Force.

The system lets warriors re-experience their event under the supervision of a mental health expert and in the safety of a controlled setting in a hospital.

On average, patients are seen once a week by their therapists and use the virtual reality system about 10-12 times for 60 minutes each time at the medical center.

However, before any patient is placed in the system, the patient would have had several visits with the therapist, explaining the situation step-by-step. The therapist then tailors the system to the individual’s traumatic experience. The patient and therapist work through the scenario to help cope with the event.

“This is about as close to a Humvee experience I can give you without putting you into an actual Humvee,” Captain Bautista said. This helps you process it so that you realize it’s an event that happened but I survived it and I can process it and move on.”

By talking about their experience, people build details into the simulation. Little by little, they gain a better understanding of the traumatic experience. The technology complements the evidence-based treatment known as ‘Prolonged Exposure Therapy’ and other research proven approache. All are used here to help deployers live a normal life.

“The ultimate goal is to get the servicemember well and back to deploying again,” said Captain Bautista.

This system also has civilian uses and another version is being developed for medical personnel who experience trauma from treating people.

“In this context we think of war, but it can be any trauma, natural disasters, Hurricane Katrina we saw a huge influx of PTSD, car accident, sexual assault, anything that you perceive your life is in danger,” said Captain Bautista.